Review: 'The Dark Knight Rises "(The Dark Knight Rises) |
30.07.2012 in Reviews | Tags: Batman, Christopher Nolan, Dark Knight, Dark Knight Rises, Anne Hathaway, Christopher Nolan, Christian Bale, Tom Hardy, drama, action, comic, reviews, trilogy, thriller, Warner index Bros
How dumb! Now when I think how I expected "TDKR" with interest and even raztrabih the ears that will not write a review on it because he would be ... good? ... And makes me sick. What a bastard index I was naive? Do not write a review on heytarsko crash that deserves two or three of them? No, no and no! Review there will be just as boring, emotionless and predictable, as was the film itself. Forget index all the crap like "epic finale", "end of story" index and other such bombastic treylarizmi. "TDKR" is thunderous Fale, emasculate the merits of the trilogy in one go, and years building atmosphere and characters are definitely lost their character and not by some ignorant beast, but by the Nolan. Full potential, all this expectation, hopes and resources, all that talent - in vain. Although moderate my hayp, will not curve sweetheart nor his peace until global forums and websites throwing superlatives for this sour boza - "TDKR" is unforgivable disappointment and those are the soft words that can describe it. Hard coming shortly.
Hell, Christopher, how did you oseresh so thoroughly? How managed to climb so high and stumble bash on the last step? When did you start favoring policy and not well-told story? You and your brother you shake. You took the idea of a dark interpretation of the origin story-it for B. Wayne and coped brilliantly with the first film. Yes, brilliant. "Batman Begins" was perfectly index structured, logical and meaningful with an appropriate and adequate final villain - in itself, it was completed and there was no need for a sequel. But there should be, right? "The Dark Knight." There already knew the claims were felt ego began to be felt and dirt. The game Ledger index save him ... close. Joker make it watchable, do it provocative and justified its existence. Actually it was a solo performance by the Joker than separate Batman movie. And somewhere Nolan had to be oriented towards completion. Two films were enough index - modern vision slowly began to get sick, the atmosphere divorce, characters exhibit the development and grim subject index was exhausted. There was no need for a third film. Even Burton did not make the mistake to continue after "Batman Returns", although it was one of a handful sikuali, better than the originals. No, he stopped in time. While Nolan decides to make Lucas and fail just like it.
But it is not the place to compare the version of Burton that Nolan. First, because such a comparison would be an insult to Burton, whose "Batman"-and unprecedented classics index and showed Gotham as it should be - crazy unreal, surreal, absurd and colorful cartoon world of heroes and villains in its purest form without burdensome Background senses in which the past had explained every five minutes, reasons argue every three lines, and the moral implications of their actions nagging in every second scene. Hyper-realism of Nolanovata version would be a good move if it was operated by measure and the measure was passed in "Dark Knight." From then on, it was no longer Batman film was not a comic book movie, but a hell of a gray, urban thriller in which the foreground is the relationship between public institutions and the bat was lost among the more interesting characters from it. Moreover - the name of the "Batman" stopped attending in the title.
In "TDKR" things do not get better, but worse. Rapidly. The plot is advanced by eight years, Harvey Dent became a county idol while Bruce Wayne is a wreck, we continue to mourn the death of his beloved cow / serious pain for eight years Maggie Gyllenhaal - kind of realism? / And behave arrogant index to "friend" Alfred. / Technical term is "servant," but let's be honest / Batman does is out almost entirely. Realistically, the man-bat / on whose actions are rooted entire index trilogy / appears for about ten minutes / total 160 / and all you do is throaty growl at people who have long known that behind the mask is Bruce Wayne. Batman is a hero, not the anti-hero - soon became the background for the actions of the new faces. Of course, I say "new" completely arbitrary, given that "TDKR" is packed with a horde of familiar actors under way and over time. / Half taken directly from "Genesis", index so do not be alarmed - you get into "sleep-in-sleep" / Except kameotata old acquaintances such as Liam Neeson and Cillian Murphy, index the first of which appeared to make connectionless between "Batman Begins" and current events, and the second because it is super beautiful scarecrow, new actors are three: Selina Kyle
30.07.2012 in Reviews | Tags: Batman, Christopher Nolan, Dark Knight, Dark Knight Rises, Anne Hathaway, Christopher Nolan, Christian Bale, Tom Hardy, drama, action, comic, reviews, trilogy, thriller, Warner index Bros
How dumb! Now when I think how I expected "TDKR" with interest and even raztrabih the ears that will not write a review on it because he would be ... good? ... And makes me sick. What a bastard index I was naive? Do not write a review on heytarsko crash that deserves two or three of them? No, no and no! Review there will be just as boring, emotionless and predictable, as was the film itself. Forget index all the crap like "epic finale", "end of story" index and other such bombastic treylarizmi. "TDKR" is thunderous Fale, emasculate the merits of the trilogy in one go, and years building atmosphere and characters are definitely lost their character and not by some ignorant beast, but by the Nolan. Full potential, all this expectation, hopes and resources, all that talent - in vain. Although moderate my hayp, will not curve sweetheart nor his peace until global forums and websites throwing superlatives for this sour boza - "TDKR" is unforgivable disappointment and those are the soft words that can describe it. Hard coming shortly.
Hell, Christopher, how did you oseresh so thoroughly? How managed to climb so high and stumble bash on the last step? When did you start favoring policy and not well-told story? You and your brother you shake. You took the idea of a dark interpretation of the origin story-it for B. Wayne and coped brilliantly with the first film. Yes, brilliant. "Batman Begins" was perfectly index structured, logical and meaningful with an appropriate and adequate final villain - in itself, it was completed and there was no need for a sequel. But there should be, right? "The Dark Knight." There already knew the claims were felt ego began to be felt and dirt. The game Ledger index save him ... close. Joker make it watchable, do it provocative and justified its existence. Actually it was a solo performance by the Joker than separate Batman movie. And somewhere Nolan had to be oriented towards completion. Two films were enough index - modern vision slowly began to get sick, the atmosphere divorce, characters exhibit the development and grim subject index was exhausted. There was no need for a third film. Even Burton did not make the mistake to continue after "Batman Returns", although it was one of a handful sikuali, better than the originals. No, he stopped in time. While Nolan decides to make Lucas and fail just like it.
But it is not the place to compare the version of Burton that Nolan. First, because such a comparison would be an insult to Burton, whose "Batman"-and unprecedented classics index and showed Gotham as it should be - crazy unreal, surreal, absurd and colorful cartoon world of heroes and villains in its purest form without burdensome Background senses in which the past had explained every five minutes, reasons argue every three lines, and the moral implications of their actions nagging in every second scene. Hyper-realism of Nolanovata version would be a good move if it was operated by measure and the measure was passed in "Dark Knight." From then on, it was no longer Batman film was not a comic book movie, but a hell of a gray, urban thriller in which the foreground is the relationship between public institutions and the bat was lost among the more interesting characters from it. Moreover - the name of the "Batman" stopped attending in the title.
In "TDKR" things do not get better, but worse. Rapidly. The plot is advanced by eight years, Harvey Dent became a county idol while Bruce Wayne is a wreck, we continue to mourn the death of his beloved cow / serious pain for eight years Maggie Gyllenhaal - kind of realism? / And behave arrogant index to "friend" Alfred. / Technical term is "servant," but let's be honest / Batman does is out almost entirely. Realistically, the man-bat / on whose actions are rooted entire index trilogy / appears for about ten minutes / total 160 / and all you do is throaty growl at people who have long known that behind the mask is Bruce Wayne. Batman is a hero, not the anti-hero - soon became the background for the actions of the new faces. Of course, I say "new" completely arbitrary, given that "TDKR" is packed with a horde of familiar actors under way and over time. / Half taken directly from "Genesis", index so do not be alarmed - you get into "sleep-in-sleep" / Except kameotata old acquaintances such as Liam Neeson and Cillian Murphy, index the first of which appeared to make connectionless between "Batman Begins" and current events, and the second because it is super beautiful scarecrow, new actors are three: Selina Kyle
No comments:
Post a Comment